Re: [baseexplorer] Vented BASE Pilot Chutes
Hello --
I too, am using vented pilot chutes on all my jumps except ultra-low freefalls and static-line jumps. I'm a firm believer that they decrease the amount of PC oscillation and result in better on-heading performance.
I don't have any statistical proof that a vented PC will open slower than a non-vented one, but when I'm doing a really low freefall, I feel better at the exit point without a PC vent, and managing your gear fear can be an important aspect of the jump.
As for static line jumps, besides the obvious fact that a PC is just a back-up device, there stands a chance that the PC may be damaged as it strafes across the object you just jumped off of. So I simply use my old 46" PCs that do not have vents as they are cheaper and less costly to replace should they get damaged.
I'm also of the opinion that vented pilot-chutes are critical when jumping technical objects in the 4 to 7 second range, where your often opening up close to an object in a slider-up configuration. I know that a few people on here did some extensive analysis of vented PCs vs. non-vented PCs at a legal event in the far East about 6 months ago -- maybe they'll share their findings on the subject.
And last but not least, ever wonder why a static-line or a PCA jump has a higher chance of an on-heading vs. a freefall? It's because there is a static-point that is deploying the canopy as the jumper falls away. Now, imagine if you could replicate this on a freefall jump...
Vented pilot chutes have taken the first step in achieving this direction...
C-ya,
Bryan