Re: [aeroflyer] Canopy Comparison
aeroflyer wrote:
OSP - terminal performance?
Slow slider. Terminal appears to be fine. My only concern with the OSP is the glide, which is not as good as some of the other canopies on the market. Other than that (and the price, if that's an issue), the OSP is a great canopy.
In reply to:
BlackJack - set # vents?
Trolls and OSP's also have a set number of vents. If price is an issue (so the OSP falls down the list a bit), the Blackjack is my top choice. Lower price, good openings, excellent glide and deep brake approaches. The other area I'd prefer the BJ to the OSP is when you need the glide to reach a remote landing area.
In reply to:
Troll DW
If you can afford it, get an OSP instead. If you can't, go with the Blackjack.
In reply to:
FOX - how many vents for sub and terminal jumps?
I'd get a Flik instead of a FOX. The FOX is more docile, but the Flik is clearly better in glide and flare.
In reply to:
Flick - bad glide?
I'm not sure where you heard this. I own Fliks, FOXes, Aces, Blackjacks, Trolls...etc. The Flik has better glide than most of the canopies on the market (the only other contenders with it at the high end of the glide spectrum are the Ace/Blackjack and the Se7en).
In reply to:
Also, is Multi (bridle attachment) worth it? Only Apex seems to offer this option; jumpers I've asked have had a negative opinion of it.
The multi seems like a good idea, but I'm not sure I've ever seen it actually solve a problem in the real world. I'd probably skip it.
In reply to:
For containers, I've somewhat narrowed it down to considering the Helium, Apex Summit, Zak2.
If money is no object, I'd pick the Summit out of those three. If cost is an issue at all, the Helium is nearly as good and much cheaper.
Tom Aiello
Tom@SnakeRiverBASE.com
Snake River BASE Academy